Rebekah Vardy and her husband Jamie made a cozy display as they posed in matching pajamas on Christmas Eve.
Television personality Rebekah, 40, and her football player boyfriend Jamie, 35, were in good spirits as they stopped in front of the Christmas tree in their luxurious home.
They could be seen arm in arm while wearing red plaid outfits, with Rebekah smiling as she leaned into Jamie.
Beloved: Rebekah Vardy, 40, and her husband Jamie, 35, put on a cozy display as they posed in matching pajamas on Christmas Eve
Leicester City player Jamie could be seen smiling as he looked at the camera in a snap, which had the words ‘Merry Christmas’ emblazoned on it.
In another photo, Rebekah can be seen with her arms around Jamie’s shoulders after jumping in the air and throwing her legs around his waist.
She captioned her post: “Happy Christmas Eve.”
Party spirit: Rebekah could be seen with her arms around Jamie’s shoulders after jumping into the air and flinging her legs around his waist in the blink of an eye
Rebekah shared a family photo from the festival earlier this week as the dramatization of the Wagatha Christie trial played on television.
Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama aired on Wednesday and Thursday with viewers reliving the drama of the WAG libel trial.
But both Coleen and Rebekeah seemed to be trying to get their minds off the show while spending quality time with their families.
Family: Takes place after Rebekah took her kids out for a day out at Belton House in Lincolnshire before Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama airs this week
Rebekah took her children to Belton House in Lincolnshire for the day, hours before the show aired.
WAG shared a photo of herself with children Taylor, 11, Sofia, seven, Finley, four, and Olivia, two.
Rebekah is also the mother of daughter Megan, 17, from a previous relationship.
Keeping busy: Coleen Rooney and Rebekah shared family photos from the festival as the dramatization of their Wagatha Christie trial played on TV
Meanwhile, Coleen and her husband Wayne enjoyed a family day out in the UK’s Lapland with their children Klay, nine, Kit, six and Cass, four.
The media personality shared a sweet photo of her young family posing for a Christmas photo with Santa and said they had an ‘amazing day’.
“Thank you @laplanduk for an amazing day as always,” Coleen wrote in the caption.
Reaction: Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama.
In the image, the boys smile as they pose next to Santa Claus and hold matching stuffed toys. Missing from the tour was her eldest son Kai, 13.
The Channel 4 series features Chanel Creswell as Coleen and Natalia Tena as Rebekah along with Michael Sheen as Coleen’s solicitor David Sherbourne.
Created from actual courtroom transcripts, Vardy v Rooney: A Courtroom Drama offers viewers the chance to relive the untelevised scenes from inside the courthouse with all the drama that had the public and media hooked for weeks.
Loving it: Those watching at home said they were ‘hooked’ by the TV offering – which was created from actual court transcripts of Coleen and Rebekah’s libel battle this summer – with one even saying: ‘This is my World Cup final!’
The former friends first publicly fell out in 2019 when Coleen accused Rebekah of leaking posts from her private Instagram account to The Sun.
His rigorous investigation to find the culprit earned him the title of Wagatha Christie in reference to mystery writer Agatha Christie.
Rebekah denied the allegations and sued for defamation, but lost in Superior Court in July, where her evidence was found to be “manifestly inconsistent” and “lacking credibility.”
In October, she was ordered to pay 90% of Coleen’s legal bills, with the first £800,000 needing to be paid within six weeks.
The former Dancing on Ice contestant also has to pay her own lawyers’ bills, meaning the massive cost of her failed defamation claim is around £4 million.
Rebekah reportedly faces an estimated £1.5m legal bill for her costs following ‘Wagatha Christie’ High Court libel battle.
It is believed that WAG – whose reputation is in tatters after she scored one of the worst own goals in British legal history – will have to find £800,000 within weeks.
New: The series recreates the legal battle between the WAGS that became known as the ‘Wagatha Christie’ trial (Coleen and Wayne pictured in court)
It comes from the hands of a Superior Court judge who dismissed her evidence as “evasive or implausible” in one of the most followed cases in recent years.
She was accused of deliberately deleting WhatsApp messages central to the case, as it was suggested her agent also intentionally dropped her phone in the North Sea.
Vardy and her football-playing husband sided with the bill after Judge Steyn ruled in Rooney’s favor in a judgment that said parts of her sworn evidence were “manifestly inconsistent”, “unreliable” and needed to be addressed. with “very considerable caution”.
On air: The show, produced by Chalkboard, who made the BBC’s landmark murder series Murder, Mystery and My Family, airs this week on Wednesday and Thursday
She lost her high-profile defamation claim against Rooney in July when Judge Steyn ruled that Rooney’s viral social media post accusing Vardy of leaking her private information to the press was “substantially true”.
A viral social media post followed in which Rooney revealed that he had placed fake stories on his Instagram page. These false stories surfaced in The Sun newspaper.
Because she had changed her settings so that only one user could see her, she felt confident making the famous ‘it’s… Rebekah Vardy’s account’ statement.
Drama: The former friends first publicly fell out in 2019 when Coleen accused Rebekah of leaking posts from her private Instagram account to The Sun
In an order made public on Tuesday, the judge ruled that Vardy should pay 90% of Rooney’s costs.
Rooney incurred total costs of over £2 million, but £350,000 of these had already accrued before the trial in May, so they were removed to produce a final figure of £1,667,860.
Vardy was ordered to pay £800,000 from the cost bill by 4 pm on 15 November.
Dissatisfied: Rebekah has denied the allegations and sued for defamation, but lost in Superior Court in July where her evidence was found to be ‘manifestly inconsistent’ and ‘unreliable’
🇧🇷
Comments
Post a Comment